I recently sent and email to Andy Ihnatko, a really cool journalist
from the Chicago Sun Times and Macbreak Weekly. I thought it was
pretty good and I'd like to post it to you the internet! (Note: I didn't take the time to do a second draft this is all from
the top of my head). Hello Andy,
I'm a fan and a happy mac user. I've heard a lot of arguments that
I've paid too much for my mac, but I can't think of a time when I had
to worry about this or that not working. Anyway, you've probably heard
and experienced this story yourself. The point of me emailing is that I'm having a hard time arguing with
my co-workers in regards to the iPhone. I got one and I love it, the
thing is testimate to modern computing and we wouldn't even be having
a discussion about "smart" or "feature" phones if it hadn't come to
pass. It seems to me, that a lot of the talk after google IO were complaints
against Apple not being open and that the web wanted to be free, but
it seems that no one brings up the fact that the very first
applications that third party developers could put on the iPhone were
*gasp* web apps that:
1) Free to develop
2) Free of censorship from apple
3) Freely available to everyone and can run on (basically) any webkit
based browser I can understand some of the frustration that some of the developers
are experiencing when it comes for submitting there application, but
it seems kind of silly when somebody complains that she or he can't
use tool Z on product i so they want to have nothing to do with it (or
cancel a national conference). To me, I'm reminded of someone saying they want to run their
playstation games on a nintendo, but then I look at the people who are
actively complaining and I wonder how many of them are console gamers. One other thing, I'm tempted to buy the playboy application and do a
little blog post about it, because I keep Leo talking about how apple
is being hypocritical on their porn policy. I don't think this is
true, because the applications that were taken off the store all
contain nudity. The description on the playboy application says that
it doesn't explicitly. The only thing is that I'm afraid my wife might
beat me if she sees it when she syncs here ipod touch, but I think I
could get away with it if a respected journalist said I should in
order to get the inside scoop. Lastly, I'd like to thank you for doing what you do. You explain your
arguments a lot better than I do and it comes across and solid
reasoning. I hope that you've read this and smiled! Salutations!
from the Chicago Sun Times and Macbreak Weekly. I thought it was
pretty good and I'd like to post it to you the internet! (Note: I didn't take the time to do a second draft this is all from
the top of my head). Hello Andy,
I'm a fan and a happy mac user. I've heard a lot of arguments that
I've paid too much for my mac, but I can't think of a time when I had
to worry about this or that not working. Anyway, you've probably heard
and experienced this story yourself. The point of me emailing is that I'm having a hard time arguing with
my co-workers in regards to the iPhone. I got one and I love it, the
thing is testimate to modern computing and we wouldn't even be having
a discussion about "smart" or "feature" phones if it hadn't come to
pass. It seems to me, that a lot of the talk after google IO were complaints
against Apple not being open and that the web wanted to be free, but
it seems that no one brings up the fact that the very first
applications that third party developers could put on the iPhone were
*gasp* web apps that:
1) Free to develop
2) Free of censorship from apple
3) Freely available to everyone and can run on (basically) any webkit
based browser I can understand some of the frustration that some of the developers
are experiencing when it comes for submitting there application, but
it seems kind of silly when somebody complains that she or he can't
use tool Z on product i so they want to have nothing to do with it (or
cancel a national conference). To me, I'm reminded of someone saying they want to run their
playstation games on a nintendo, but then I look at the people who are
actively complaining and I wonder how many of them are console gamers. One other thing, I'm tempted to buy the playboy application and do a
little blog post about it, because I keep Leo talking about how apple
is being hypocritical on their porn policy. I don't think this is
true, because the applications that were taken off the store all
contain nudity. The description on the playboy application says that
it doesn't explicitly. The only thing is that I'm afraid my wife might
beat me if she sees it when she syncs here ipod touch, but I think I
could get away with it if a respected journalist said I should in
order to get the inside scoop. Lastly, I'd like to thank you for doing what you do. You explain your
arguments a lot better than I do and it comes across and solid
reasoning. I hope that you've read this and smiled! Salutations!
